The majority of school shootings have taken place during William Jefferson Blythe Clinton and George W. Bush’s reign. Precisely forty out of forty two shootings. Since its inception, America has always had guns and schools coexisting at about the same time. Yet amazingly forty shootings have taken place during their presidency! Consider also that these forty shootings took place during a period when the number of gun laws and restrictions was growing! At least during the Clinton regime. Further, it is of course a given that no one has ever cared more about ending school violence and taking away guns then these presidents have. Nor has anyone else worked harder than they have toward this end.

Note that I am only including intentional shootings, not accidental gun discharges. Nor am I counting the incidents of carnage involving the use of a car (as in California in 1999) or any other type of instrument. The list of school shootings during the reign of Clinton is as follows:

February 9, 1992. Stockton, California, high school, 2 dead.

May 1, 1992. Brooklyn, New York, high school, 4 dead, 9 wounded.

January 12, 1993. Miami, Florida, high school, 1 dead.

January 18, 1993. Grayson, Kentucky, high school, 2 dead.

March 25, 1993. St. Louis, Missouri, high school, 1 wounded.

May 24, 1993. Pennsburg, Pennsylvania, high school, 1 dead.

April 8, 1994. Maryland high school, 1 wounded.

February 2, 1996. Moses Lake, Washington, junior high school, 3 dead,1 wounded.

April 15,1996. Washington, District of Columbia, high school, 1 wounded.

February 19, 1997. Bethel, Alaska, high school, 2 dead, 2 wounded.

May 1, 1997. New York City, New York, high school, 1 wounded.

October 1, 1997. Pearl, Mississippi, high school, 2 dead, 7 wounded.

December 1, 1997. West Peducah, Kentucky, high school, 3 dead, 5 wounded.

December 15, 1997. Stamps, Arkansas, 2 wounded.

March 24, 1998. Jonesboro, Arkansas, middle school, 5 dead, 10 wounded.

April 24, 1998. Edinboro, Pennsylvania, middle school, 1 dead.

April 28, 1998. Pomona, California, elementary school, 2 dead, 1 wounded.

May 19, 1998. Fayetteville, Tennessee, high school, 1 dead.

May 21, 1998. Springfield, Oregon, high school, 2 dead.

June 15, 1998. Richmond, Virginia, high school, 2 wounded.

April 20, 1999. Littleton, Colorado, high school, 15 dead, 28 wounded.

May 20, 1999. Conyers, Georgia, high school, 6 wounded.

November 19, 1999. Deming, New Mexico, middle school, 1 dead.

December 6, 1999. Fort Gibson, Oklahoma, middle school, 4 wounded.

February 29, 2000. Mount Morris Township, Michigan, elementary school, 1 dead.

May 26, 2000. Lake Worth, Florida, middle school, 1 dead.

September 26, 2000. New Orleans, Carter G. Woodson Middle School, 2 wounded.

August 28, 2000. Fayetteville, Arkansas, University of Arkansas, 2 dead.

So the “body count” during Clinton’s war on America is fifty one dead and eighty three wounded.

The list of school shootings prior to and after Clinton are as follows:

August 1, 1966. Austin, Texas, college, 14 dead.

July 12, 1976. Fullerton, California, college, 7 dead, 2 wounded.

March 5, 2001. Santee, California, high school, 2 dead 13 wounded.

March 7, 2001. Williamsport, Pennsylvania, high school, 1 wounded.

March 22, 2001. El Cajon, California, high school, 5 wounded.

March 30, 2001. Gary, Indiana, high school, 1 dead.

January 15, 2002. New York, New York, 2 wounded.

January 16, 2002. Grungy, Virginia, law school, 3 dead, 3 wounded.

2003, Case Western Reserve University Law School, 1 dead, 2 wounded.

Jan 10, 2003, Orlando, Florida, middle school, 1 dead.

September 2003, Cold Spring, MN, high School, 2 dead.

March 21, 2005, Bemidji, MN, high school, 10 dead, 15 wounded.

October 20, 2005, Saginaw, MI, high school, 1 wounded.

November 8, 2005, Jacksboro, TN, high school, 1 dead, 2 wounded.

The “body count” for all non Clinton school shootings is forty two dead and thirty six wounded.

What is the explanation for the fact that 96 percent of the school shootings have taken place during Clinton (aka Bubba) and George W. Bush’s (aka Dubya) presidency? Let us now consider some possible explanations. As mentioned above, these shootings have taken place during a time period when there was an increase in the number of federal and state laws restricting or eliminating gun ownership. In other words, during the pre Clinton era, there weren’t enough gun laws. Yet, in that same Wild West pre Clinton era, there were only two school shootings!

That is to say, during the 215 years (1776 to 1991) of American history, guns were more readily available to our children. One might even say that the previous presidents (especially those evil Republicans) didn’t care enough for our children. So then why is it that during the pre Clinton era filled with uncompassionate presidents and loose gun laws, there were only two school shootings? Hmmm? Obviously the explanation for the increase in shootings during Bubba and Dubya’s reign is not the lack of gun laws.

Is the explanation to be found in the prevalence of drugs? This can’t be right since drugs were readily available and widely used in the 1960s and 1970s. Just ask Clinton. Drugs, whether they are legal or illegal, have been used in America for a long time. Plus, if you count alcohol as a drug, then surely in America’s past when its availability was not as highly regulated and the social morality of its use ebbed and flowed, there would have been a good number of school shootings. However, there wasn’t.

The only pre Clinton school shootings took place in August 1966 in Austin, Texas, and in July 1976 in Fullerton, California. The decade of the 1980s, according to the liberal media, was the decade of greed. A decade when the rich got richer and the poor got poorer. The decade of Reagan and trickle down economics. So then why wasn’t there any school shootings then? Consider well that in the 1990s there have been more Americans investing in the stock market then ever before. Plus, the amount of cash they put into the stock market has been greater than ever before. W hy would they do that kind of investing? If the 1980s were the decade of greed, then why not the 1990s given the above? Why aren’t the 1990s considered a decade of extreme greed?

So then let us posit a possible explanation, for discussion, that the cause of the school shootings in the Clinton era (which takes up most of the 1990s) was due to greed. If this explanation were true, then we have to ask what quantum of greed was necessary to cause only two school shootings prior to his presidency? Next, how much more greed was present in America during Clinton’s presidency in order to cause twenty eight school shootings? How much greed is present in America as a direct result of Dubya? Why was there such a tremendous increase in greed during Clinton’s presidency over all other president’s combined? Plus, why did the greed factor go down in 1995? That was the only year of his presidency in which there were no school shootings.

Additionally, how could greed possibly be the explanation since the 1990s are not a decade of greed? If it is a decade of greed (even though the media and the Democrats are not claiming it to be) then why in the world would the United States government be encouraging Americans to invest in the stock market? Why would the United States Congress be considering allowing Americans to invest part of their retirement funds into the stock market? What do we mean by stating that greed might be the explanation for the school shootings? Do we mean to say that the shooters were greedy? Or that the victims were greedy? Who was greedy? Was it the then current president? Who was it? Surely that is important to know.

Plus, how much greed was necessary to initiate the school shootings? Are we to believe that if a certain person or persons have a certain amount of greed, then that will cause school children to grab guns and start shooting people at school? Greed is not therefore the cause of the school shootings. Not in the sense of a bottom line explanation. It should be obvious that all of the shooters were greedy about something at sometime in their lives. Some of them may have been motivated to some extent by greed in the course of their shootings. All men and women, boys and girls, are equally subject to being greedy. Greed alone can’t explain why 96 percent of the school shootings happened during Bubba and Dubya’s presidency versus being statistically spread out during the majority of the other president’s terms.

Could we offer in explanation that our schools during Bubba and Dubya’s terms have been unsafe or are more unsafe? If that were true then we would have to state that in the pre Bubba and Dubya years, when schools were safe or safer, that there were only two shootings. S o how were schools different back then? Simple–back then schools didn’t have metal detectors, mandatory uniforms, zero tolerance policies, class sizes were larger, there were not as many gun laws as now, and there was greater access to guns. Additionally, about thirty years ago, prayers were routinely said in class, as was the pledge of allegiance, and classes were always taught in English. Hmmm–I don’t think we like that answer, do we? Okay, so then we will drop this possible explanation.

I would offer that the only primary explanation is that Satan is causing these tragic events. This is the opportune time for him to act. In light of the foregoing examples of Bubba’s acts of the sinful nature in my book Saviour Clinton, it is apparent that he belongs to the Devil. “He who does what is sinful is of the devil, because the devil has been sinning from the beginning….This is how we know who the children of God are and who the children of the devil are: Anyone who does not do what is right is not a child of God” (1 John 3:8, 10). Christ said of the devil, “The thief comes only to steal and kill and destroy” (John 10:10).

All people are born in sin and are members of Satan’s tribe, so to speak. To put it another way, they have membership or allegiance or citizenship in the kingdom of darkness. The Apostle Paul wrote in his letter to the church in Rome (Rom. 3:10 18) of this situation: “There is no one righteous, not even one; there is no one who understands, no one who seeks God. All have turned away, they have together become worthless; there is no one who does good, not even one. Their throats are open graves; their tongues practice deceit. The poison of vipers is on their lips. Their mouths are full of cursing and bitterness. Their feet are swift to shed blood; ruin and misery mark their ways, and the way of peace they do not know. There is no fear of God before their eyes.”

So where does Dubya fit in? Easy. The bible says; “But now I am writing you that you must not associate with anyone who calls himself a brother but is sexually immoral or greedy, an idolater or a slanderer, a drunkard or a swindler. With such a man do not even eat.” 1 Cor. 5:11. Dubya has from day one worked to protect and honor the spirit of the anti Christ in Bubba. Remember that on the day of Dubya’s first inauguration, when there was a boat load of evidence that the Clintons and their ilk defaced, destroyed, and stole property from the White House, Dubya firmly put his foot down to make sure there was only an appearance of an investigation into those acts. And no one was ever convicted for such acts.

Continuing on during Dubya’s presidency, we find that he and his father have grown closer and closer to Bubba and his wife. Numerous articles have been written about this budding romance. See for example the following articles; (1) Conservatives Irked Over Bush Clinton Loveless, June 15, 2004 Newsman article; (2) Presidents: Bubba and Dubya-Warming Up, January 8, 2005, MSNBC article; (3) Clinton, Bush in Super Bowl Tsunami Pitch, January 27, 2005, Newsman article; (4) Bush Picks Brains of Clinton, Father, April 9, 2005, Washington times article; (5) President Asks Bush and Clinton to Assist In Hurricane Relief Effort, September 1, 2005, The White House press release.

Clearly God said to have nothing to do with such a brother as quote above. Bubba certainly fills that description. Even more certain is both Bush’s flagrantly violating God’s Word. I know in defense of such sin many will say that I don’t understand this or that. Or that I am wrong. Dubya has even said in effect that only Bubba could understand his life since they are both presidents. What that really is saying is that because both of us are sinners, and we share the same job description (or life experience, or had the same women, or robbed the same people, et cetera), it is only natural and beneficial that we have dinner together. That we have fellowship together. Yet God said to have nothing to do with that sinner. Not even have dinner with him or her. It thus seems to me that we must conclude that God is wrong. That 2nd Corinthians was but inspired vacuous verbal vomit (IV3 or cubed). That Mark is all fouled up.

However, the reality is that by living the lives they have, these two men alone have provided an opportunity for 96% of all school shootings to take place in America. Some say that even though Satan came but to steal, kill, and destroy, this aberrant statistic is meaningless. All those who were killed or wounded, and their ravaged families, are just supposed to be “comforted” and deal with their loss while we are told to trust these two men? How about agreeing with God’s Word? Especially after seeing the devastation the disobedience of Bubba and Dubya have caused on America.

It is the citizens of the kingdom of darkness that are expected to continuously exhibit the fruits of the sinful nature as mentioned in Galatians 5 above. This was mentioned by the apostle John in 1 John 3:9. He wrote, “No one who is born of God will continue to sin, because God’s seed remains in him; he cannot go on sinning, because he has been born of God.” Clearly, by examining the actions of Bubba as provided earlier in my book, the only conclusion to be reached is that he belongs to Satan. He is still a citizen of Satan’s kingdom.

Clinton enjoys incredible favor with the Devil. It can be said that as far as the United States is concerned, he is the Devil’s number one. As president he was in fact and symbolically the leader of America. While he was leading America in a certain direction, the Devil came following behind and caused these shootings to take place. So why now? Why was this the opportune time for the Devil to cause 67 percent of the school shootings in America during Bubba’s reign? And 96% of them during Bubba and Dubya’s presidency. That is the question, my friend. That is the question that must be answered so that appropriate action can be taken.

Let us examine another element of the ballyhooed Clinton legacy. That is the extraordinary increase in “hate” web sites as tracked by the Simon Wiesenthal Center. According to them, the number of hate web sites prior to the Oklahoma City bombing was only four. Afterwards, it grew to over 2,500! Naturally we have to ask why the sudden increase after that act of domestic terrorism. You will recall that the Oklahoma City bombing happened on April 15, 1995. That was during the first term of Clinton. That year was also the only year in which no school shootings took place during his reign. The Oklahoma bombing killed 168 Americans. Though Americans have from the beginning killed other Americans, this was at the time the first and largest act of domestic terrorism in the modern century.

We know that according to Jesus (as recorded in the book of John, chapters 8:44 and 10:10), Satan “…was a murder from the beginning, not holding to the truth, for there is no truth in him,” and “The thief comes only to steal kill and destroy.” Could the twenty eight school shootings have taken place during Clinton’s time as president out of mere coincidence? Or was it rather that during his reign, the time was right for Satan to come in and kill 219 people and would about 100 others though these two means alone? What are the possible reasons to explain the explosive growth in hate sites on the Internet? Is it Gore’s fault since he claims to have invented the Internet? Why should the incredible ease to post opinions and stories on the Internet give rise to such a tremendous number of hate sites since 1995? Could it be that all the people haters suddenly went online in 1995?

That’s not a likely explanation, so what other reason could there be?Were all the people haters suddenly paid to spread their message on the Internet? Was all this hate mongering a part of a vast conspiracy? Left, center, or middle, take your choice. If so, where is the evidence to support such an explanation? Moreover, why did the sites pop up after the Oklahoma bombing? Was this all part of a well orchestrated ploy by Attorney General Janet Reno to discredit the Internet and demonstrate a reason for its being regulated, licensed, and taxed by the federal government?

One thing is for sure–it is easy to demonstrate that the continuous actions and words of Clinton and his administration testify that they are citizens of Satan’s kingdom. Therefore, it should not be surprising that Satan used this man’s time in office to spread death and destruction all across America. And that embracing him as Dubya has is sinful and deadly. This result should be as much expected by Americans as the daily rising of the sun in the east.